🔗 Share this article

Whenever a major prize-giving event nears, you'll find a clamor to include additional classifications to honor unsung work and satisfy the spirits of followers who have specialized interests.

A fellow writer previously argued for a horror game category. It would be amazing. The same goes for strategy board titles, representing someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward because like all dedicated enthusiasts, I possess a compelling case supporting my request remains most pressing and important of all. The demand is this: There should be a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works is not a science; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably generate discussions and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why cinema institutions avoid this approach. Yet it remains an essential concession for the industry of gaming, that demonstrate such variety they barely qualify a single creative category.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and to ensure all game types to compete fairly, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

The major gaming awards currently feature classifications covering Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these six categories actually cover numerous genres, and you can find room for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. No appropriate category exists for their placement. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, all very different: the architectural riddles in a particular game, intense tile-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. Where could they possibly go among existing types? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games published annually lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit award groups including Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive Indie races.

• A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated for anything in 2014
• Another imaginative release was excluded in 2019
• Well-received sorting experience got ignored that year
• Limited numbers of puzzle games barely qualified for niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often modest productions, yet the craft in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games count as most popular titles worldwide continuing this trend for over a decade.

The famous puzzle experience challenges well-known building titles for the title of highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, while interacting with diverse game types.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. You could fill a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.

And to reiterate, these include experiences that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Puzzle game makers are working at the challenging frontier of video game design, developing some of most fundamental forms of the video game form. Just like film action specialists, they deserve recognition. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.